Hey Julien, Have you rebased your patch train after Andrew’s commits?
Warner > On Dec 2, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > On 28/11/2014 13:57, Andrew Turner wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:35:36 +0000 >> Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Major changes in this new version: >>> * Add Device Tree support via Linux Boot ABI >>> * Add zImage support >>> * Netfront support >>> * Blkfront fixes >>> * DOM0 support (separate branch see below) >>> >>> The former item is very hackish. I was wondering if there is another >>> way to do it? Or maybe we should support FreeBSD Bootloader in ARM >>> guest? >> >> I think using the loader is the correct way to handle booting in Xen. It >> allows us to relocate the dtb as required. It look like a zImage then >> use the Xen console to interact with the user. > > Thanks, I will give a look to this solution. > >>> >>> The patch series is divided in X parts: >>> * #1 - #14: Clean up and bug fixes for Xen. They can be >>> applied without the rest of the series >>> * #15 - #19: Update Xen interface to 4.4 and fix >>> compilation. It's required for ARM. >>> * #20 - #26: Update Xen code to support ARM >>> * #27 - #33: Rework the event channel code for supporting >>> ARM. I will work with Royger to come with a common interface with x86 >>> * #34 - #36: Add support for ARM in Xen code >>> * #37 - #46: ARM bug fixes and new features. Some of thoses >>> patches (#37 - #40) could be applied without the rest of the series >>> * #47 - #48: Add Xen ARM platform >> >> I have committed patches 30 and 40 as they look good. > > Thanks! > >> I'm not familiar >> with the code to review 37 or 38, however from my quick look at 38 I >> appears _bus_dmamap_load_buffer does take in to account buflen and >> dmat->maxsegsz when setting sgsize just not dmat->alignment. > > Right, I guess I could just keep the roundup2. > >> >> ... >>> >>> TODO: >>> * Add SMP/PSCI support in FreeBSD. Could be useful other >>> platform too >> >> Adding PSCI support is on my TODO lost for arm64, however I don't >> expect to get on ti in until early next year. > > BTW, what is the actual status of the ARM64 port? I plan to give a look > for adding Xen support too.
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail