Hello,
El 15/05/15 a les 14.22, Eggert, Lars ha escrit:
> On 2015-5-15, at 13:59, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Can you provide the bootlog with the patch applied?
>
> Below.
That's weird, AFAICT the patch I've send you should force isci to use
the legacy interrupt, but it seems it still tries to use MSI-X.
I've attached another patch that will force isci to print some
messages, can you try that?
It should be applied on a clean tree, since it also contains the change
to xen_msi.c I've send you before, and of course you should not set
hw.isci.force_legacy_interrupts when testing it.
>> Also, can you try if there's any difference when setting:
>> hw.isci.force_legacy_interrupts=1
>> on /boot/loader.conf?
>
> That seems to elimintate the storm. The isci line is now simply:
>
> isci0: <Intel(R) C600 Series Chipset SAS Controller (SATA mode)> port
> 0x6000-0x60ff mem 0xde07c000-0xde07ffff,0xddc00000-0xddffffff irq 16 at
> device 0.0 on pci10
Can you confirm the device works properly with
hw.isci.force_legacy_interrupts=1?
Thanks, Roger.
---
diff --git a/sys/dev/isci/isci_interrupt.c b/sys/dev/isci/isci_interrupt.c
index 52c64f7..f82b9de 100644
--- a/sys/dev/isci/isci_interrupt.c
+++ b/sys/dev/isci/isci_interrupt.c
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ isci_interrupt_setup(struct isci_softc *isci)
isci->num_interrupts = max_msix_messages;
pci_alloc_msix(isci->device, &isci->num_interrupts);
+ printf("ISCI: isci->num_interrupts: %u max_msix_messages: %u\n",
+ isci->num_interrupts, max_msix_messages);
if (isci->num_interrupts == max_msix_messages)
use_msix = TRUE;
}
diff --git a/sys/x86/xen/xen_msi.c b/sys/x86/xen/xen_msi.c
index 0f678b1..21b542a 100644
--- a/sys/x86/xen/xen_msi.c
+++ b/sys/x86/xen/xen_msi.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ int
xen_msix_alloc(device_t dev, int *irq)
{
+ *irq = 0;
return (ENXIO);
}
_______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
