Thank you. Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> schrieb am Do., 19. Juli 2018, 11:50:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:42:24AM +0200, Gerd Hafenbrack wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Roger Pau Monné <roy...@freebsd.org> schrieb am Do., 19. Juli 2018, > 11:05: > > > > > ... Later on, we sadly discovered > > > that PVHv1 was still too similar to classic PV, and didn't allow Xen > > > to make use of all the possible hardware virtualization extensions, so > > > PVHv2 was introduced ~2 years ago ... > > > > > > > Is there a page comparing hardware virtualization extensions between > PVHv1 > > and PVHv2? > > Hm, not really. PVHv2 has some devices (either emulated by software or > hardware) that are not present on PVHv1: LAPIC, IO-APIC. The way to > setup and inject interrupts on PVHv2 is also the same as on native > (IO-APIC pin, MSI or MSI-X). > > Also PVHv2 allows to change paging modes (or completely disable > paging), which PVHv1 didn't allow at all. > > To sum up, PVHv2 is very, very similar to HVM but it doesn't require a > QEMU device model in order to run. > > > What about AMD support? We are getting EPIC machines. > > Yes, PVHv2 supports AMD, although I have to admit I haven't done > extensive testing on AMD due to my lack of AMD hardware. I expect > that's going to change soon. > > I've tested PVHv2 FreeBSD DomUs on AMD hardware, but I haven't tested > FreeBSD PVHv2 Dom0 on AMD yet. > > Roger. > _______________________________________________ freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
