On 12/19/2011 02:03, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 19 Dec 2011 09:59, "Doug Barton" <do...@freebsd.org > <mailto:do...@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :) The problem is that the current >> OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen >> is to use xlockmore. >> >> Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step >> would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to >> avoid having them both defined. > > I'll look at that later.
Thanks. In answer to your question avoiding having both enabled would be nice since it avoids duplicate, unnecessary redundancy. >> Better yet would be to detect if one or the other is already installed, >> and default the OPTIONS accordingly. > > Autodetection in ports? No thanks! I didn't suggest autodetecting for the dependencies, I suggested it for the OPTIONS. That's been done for a long time, and ideally should be how it's always done. Doug -- [^L] Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"