On 12/19/2011 02:03, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2011 09:59, "Doug Barton" <do...@freebsd.org
> <mailto:do...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>> Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :)  The problem is that the current
>> OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen
>> is to use xlockmore.
>> Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step
>> would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to
>> avoid having them both defined.
> I'll look at that later.

Thanks. In answer to your question avoiding having both enabled would be
nice since it avoids duplicate, unnecessary redundancy.

>> Better yet would be to detect if one or the other is already installed,
>> and default the OPTIONS accordingly.
> Autodetection in ports? No thanks!

I didn't suggest autodetecting for the dependencies, I suggested it for
the OPTIONS. That's been done for a long time, and ideally should be how
it's always done.




        Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
        Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to