On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 23:18:21 +0800
Ben Woods <woods...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 22 May 2016 at 03:56, Olivier Duchateau <olivi...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > New release 0.6.0 of x11/xfce4-dashboard was published. But I noticed core
> > dump with Xfdashboard utility (not the settings manager) on 9.3-RELEASE
> > (with Radeon Xpress 200M), 10.3-RELEASE (with Vesa, this box needs to be
> > updated to -CURRENT, but currently I don't have enough time).
> >
> > Patch is available here [1] or in Xfce devel repository (in 4.12 branch).
> >
> > Crash is related to Clutter and OpenGL.
> >
> > So if someone can test/run with recent GPU drivers, I appreciate it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > [1] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/patches/xfce4-dashboard.diff
> 
> 
> Hi Olivier,
> 
> I have just tried this a few times, and it seems to be working ok for me.
> 
> I am using the scfb driver, as I have a broadwell laptop and am not using
> the latest drm-next graphics driver source tree.
> 
> I do get the following output when running xfdashboard from the console,
> but it still works fine:
> 
> $ xfdashboard
> 
> (xfdashboard:2862): xfdashboard-CRITICAL **:
> xfdashboard_window_tracker_monitor_is_primary: assertion
> 'XFDASHBOARD_IS_WINDOW_TRACKER_MONITOR(self)' failed
> libuwind: _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIE
> (xfdashboard:2862): xfdashboard-WARNING **: Determination of application by
> checking environment variables is not supported at this system.
> libuwind: _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind:
> _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIE%
> 
> Regards,
> Ben

Thanks Ben, for feedback.

This week-end I'll test on my machine running 11.0-RC2 (when migration will be 
complete). If everything is ok, I'll commit.

Reagrds,

-- 
Olivier Duchateau <olivi...@freebsd.org>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to