> On 1/6/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a única mensagem que vi no messages do .10 é:
>
> Jan  6 20:38:45 xxx kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90
> Jan  6 20:38:45 xxx kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start
> threshold to 120 bytes
> Jan  6 20:40:44 xxx kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90
> Jan  6 20:40:44 xxx kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start
> threshold to 180 bytes
> Jan  6 20:41:52 xxx kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90
> Jan  6 20:41:52 xxx kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start
> threshold to 240 bytes
> Jan  6 20:42:38 xxx kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90
> Jan  6 20:42:38 xxx kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start
> threshold to 300 bytes
> Jan  6 20:43:26 xxx kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90
> Jan  6 20:43:26 xxx kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start
> threshold to 360 bytes

 TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold  The device generated a
 transmit underrun error while attempting to DMA and transmit a packet.
 This happens if the host is not able to DMA the packet data into the
 NIC's FIFO fast enough.  The driver will dynamically increase the trans-
 mit start threshold so that more data must be DMAed into the FIFO before
 the NIC will start transmitting it onto the wire.

 Acho que não é isso que está causando o problema.

>
> mas buscas no google me retornam que não deve ser isso.
>
> e isso (várias vezes):
>
> arp: 192.168.254.10 moved from 00:50:da:8f:1b:24 to 00:13:46:9b:13:e5 on
> vr0
> arp: 192.168.254.10 moved from 00:13:46:9b:13:e5 to 00:50:da:8f:1b:24 on
> vr0

 Existem duas máquinas com o mesmo IP na rede... verifique de quem são
essas dois MACs e se os APs estão com algum esquema de proxy ARP.

--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
http://tirloni.org


-------------------------
Histórico: http://www.fug.com.br/historico/html/freebsd/
Sair da lista: https://www.fug.com.br/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Responder a