<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=36583 >
Hi, Egor, a good spot! The civil war rule actually sucks :) It would be much better, if nation will have possibility to split into two other nations. Not only to separate some rebel province. There are quite many examples: USSR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Serbia & Montenegro. Okay, I will fix the ruleset. Thanks, Daniil. On 22/02/07, Egor Vyscrebentsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=36583 > > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 Daniil Ivanov wrote: > > > The corresponding patch for nation Soviet. I added all lacking > > former soviet republics. It seems it doesn't violate the game. > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've created a patch for adding Kazakh nation. > > > The flag is taken from Wikipedia website, they have statement > > > it is released into the public domain. > > > >+conflicts_with = "russian", "ukrainian", "belarusian", > >+ "lithuaninan", "latvian", "estonian", > >+ "moldovan", > >+ "georgian", "armenian", "azerbaijanian", > >+ "kazakh", "uzbek", "tajik", "kyrgyz", "turkmen" > >+civilwar_nations = "russian", "ukrainian", "belarusian", > >+ "lithuaninan", "latvian", "estonian", > >+ "moldovan", > >+ "georgian", "armenian", "azerbaijanian", > >+ "kazakh", "uzbek", "tajik", "kyrgyz", "turkmen" > > Erm... Why conflicts_with and civilwar_nations lists are identical? > Have I missed somethig or conflict_with is defined for two nations > will not be in the same game? > > -- > Thanks, evyscr > > > _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
