<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 >
2007/4/18, Jason Dorje Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 > > > Ulrik Sverdrup wrote: > > <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39346 > > > > > Comparing 2.1 beta 4 to 2.0, 2.1 looks better because of changed > > drawing code. 2.1 has smoohter edges and looks better. > > > > Significan is however the big regression in drawing performance > > between 2.0 and 2.1. In 2.1, right-clicking around to move the map is > > painfully slow compared to 2.0 (where it is adequately quick!). > > > > I think this should be treated like a regression. Just like we have a > > checkbox for "Better for of war drawing", please instate a toggle for > > "dithering" (or otherwise smooth graphics), if that can improve > > drawing performance. it would be greatly appreciated. > > > > For me 2.1 is a great step forward, also in usability all around. > > Graphics is nothing compared to this, and because of that I would like > > 2.1 to be as snappy as 2.0 (with amplio) > > Amplio is not gonna be as fast as trident or isotrident; this is > unavoidable. > > There ARE a lot of configurable options in the graphics section. Does > playing with them improve things at all? > > -jason > I'm using amplio in both 2.0 and 2.1... I've been trying all options and there is nothing that can make it close to 2.0 scrolling speed etc. Running Ubuntu 6.10/ppc, compiled freeciv myself. _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
