<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39830 >
On 11/5/07, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The server "knows" the city isn't there anymore. It expands the border, > but doesn't update the vision. Probably, send_map_is_known_and_seen() > needs to return TRUE when the tile is owned by the player. Easy enough. > > Meanwhile, the server "knows" the client "knows" the city is there. The > border code currently has (at least) two potentially conflicting values: > > struct player *owner; /* Player owning this tile, or NULL. */ > struct tile *owner_source; /* what makes it owned by owner */ > > The latter isn't actually pointing to the source, it's pointing to the > tile of the source. That tile no longer really has the source on it in > the server view, but has it in the client view! But why is this a problem? The vision code and the border code should not interact at all in the current design. > Moreover, the savegame map_load should run map_calculate_borders(). Is > there a reason it was only done between turns? Because running it causes borders to expand, and saving then loading should not change game state. - Per _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
