On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many distributions are still not released version (of the
> distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper & Gutsy are both
> supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to
> be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's over year since 2.0.9 was
> released and many crasher bugs and security fixes has been since made
> to S2_0 branch.
> - ML
I support this.
Jason, are there any particular differences in creating a 2.0 release
as opposed to a 2.1 one?
Freeciv-dev mailing list