Follow-up Comment #12, bug #13600 (project freeciv): "What about a possible cleanup patch to use 'negated' and remove 'nreqs'?"
Presumably nreqs support was introduced just because somebody thought it to be cleaner and easier for ruleset authors; no need to define 'negated' value for each and every requirement. I don't have strong opinion which way is better. Unless there is good reason to change it, I'm against changing working system to another equally bad. That would only confuse those ruleset authors who want to update their ruleset from 2.1 to 2.2 and take default ruleset as an example. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/bugs/?13600> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freecivfirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev