Follow-up Comment #12, bug #13600 (project freeciv):

"What about a possible cleanup patch to use
'negated' and remove 'nreqs'?"

Presumably nreqs support was introduced just because somebody thought it to
be cleaner and easier for ruleset authors; no need to define 'negated' value
for each and every requirement.

I don't have strong opinion which way is better. Unless there is good reason
to change it, I'm against changing working system to another equally bad.
That would only confuse those ruleset authors who want to update their
ruleset from 2.1 to 2.2 and take default ruleset as an example.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/bugs/?13600>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to