2009/11/22 Pepeto <pepet...@gmail.com>:
> Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 21:15 +0200, Marko Lindqvist a écrit :
>> 2009/11/21 Daniel Markstedt <markst...@gmail.com>:
>> > Finally managed to figure out how to do custom searches in the bug
>> > tracker using "Query Forms" (not exactly user-friendly) and found out
>> > there are still four open bugs left with a 2.1.10 target:
>>
>>  Now there seemed to be three.
>>
>> > Are any of these showstoppers for the release, or can we postpone them
>> > to a theoretical 2.1.11?
>>
>>  #14812
>>  At least it's not regression since 2.1.9. I would postpone this to
>> 2.1.11 rather than to postpone 2.1.10 release.
>
> The patch is really safe and could be committed maybe.  As long it is
> ready to commit, maybe we should fix early tomorrow ?

 Oh, I didn't notice it had patch already. Yes, it seems like one we
can safely commit.

>>  #14473
>>  Full redesign to critical part of the code in a stable and mature
>> branch? No way. This is probably 2.3.0 (yes, 2.*3*.0) stuff...
>
> I removed the planned release for this item.
>
>>  #13501
>>  I assume this bug is invalid as additional information has not been
>> provided after it was asked months ago.
>
> Probably...


 - ML

_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to