Follow-up Comment #2, bug #15499 (project freeciv):
>> The tests affect the client capability, which will always
>> return TRUE because we have this capability. The server would
>> affect the server capability (client.conn.capability).
>
>
>Is it enough to use 'client.conn.capability' in the test to do
> the right think?
our_capability refers to the capability of our side. So, if we are running
the server, it is the server capability; if we are at client side, it refers
to the client capability.
The capability string of the connected entities is stored in the struct
connection::capability. So, on server side, the capabilities of each client
is stored in pconn->capability; on client side, the capability of the server
is stored in client.conn.capability (client.conn is the connection to the
server, formerly called aconn, such as in S2_1 branch).
> old server - old client
This case doesn't make sense for us, because it occurs in old revisions. What
we are doing is a new client connected to a new or old server; or new server
connected by new or old clients. So the case old/old shouldn't be thought
here.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?15499>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
