Update of patch #4188 (project freeciv):
Status: None => Ready For Test
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #2:
Patch.
Do not add "AutoOnCityCenter" extra if there already is conflicting extra on
tile. That doesn't make the ruleset use-case I wanted possible, but is clear
rule we can implement (and what other ruleset authors probably expect).
"AlwaysOnCityCenter" is not changed - the flag is stronger indication that
extra should exist than conflict is to indicate that it shouldn't. I wonder if
we should remove the existing conflicting extra, though, if it too doesn't
have "AlwaysOnCityCenter" (With current behavior you can build such extras
before "AlwaysOnCityCenter" becomes available, but not after as there would be
conflict)
(file #19434, file #19435)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: ConflictingAutoCityCenter.patch Size:2 KB
File name: ConflictingAutoCityCenter-S2_5.patch Size:2 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?4188>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
