Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4369 (project freeciv):

As civ2civ3 is new ruleset as part of freeciv proper in 2.5, I wonder if we
should remove these uses of distinct rule_names completely - there's no
backward compatibility reason to make it different from user visible name.
But civ2civ3 has indeed existed as separately available custom ruleset, so
there's also point in keeping backward compatibility to that version.

Also, while this should be fixed, it has not caused any real harm so far, as
the same strings exist elsewhere and have to be translated anyway.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/patch/?4369>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to