Follow-up Comment #5, bug #21992 (project freeciv):
Oh! Of course, I forgot to think about the effects of moving to reqs outside
my change. Thanks.
My other test indicates that I've caused no obvious regressions, and review
time's up, so in it goes.
----
> What about making "present" tri-state value, with one value
> being equivalent to current TRUE, and the other two being like
> current FALSE but one indicating "replacement" and the other
> "prevention"?
Ah, yes, that's a better idea than keeping nreqs, if we need it. Any more
thoughts in that direction should go to a new ticket.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?21992>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
