Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22848 (project freeciv):
> Most classic ruleset files contain comments explaining what the
> various name = value lines can do [...] please use this style
> also in the classic effects.ruleset
doc/README.effects is the best reference for this (although it still leaves
something to be desired).
Effects are more complicated than other ruleset elements, so documentation in
header comments wouldn't be sustainable (the other ruleset comments are
already a maintenance headache).
If effects.ruleset doesn't refer to doc/README.effects, it should, of course.
> Please replace "default" by "classic" in the descriptions of
> all classic ruleset files
There have been several fixes of this kind since 2.5.0-beta1; are there any
remaining instances?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22848>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
