Follow-up Comment #3, task #7327 (project freeciv):
> If we should use doxygen documentation, shouldn't we begin to
> use doxygen syntax in the new comments?
That was the idea discussed at the the time doxygen usage was first worked on.
We should pick up the work again, even if some parts of the code still lack
the previous round of documentation improvements (namely: all functions should
have function header: patch #2427)
Maybe making doxygen comments mandatory for any new functions that go in to
trunk after S2_6 branching? ('svn cp savegame2.c savegame3.c' does not count
as new functions, does it?)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/task/?7327>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
