Follow-up Comment #8, bug #23231 (project freeciv):

advance_by_number() has behaved like that always, or at least for a very long
time, so it has not caused other problems too obvious.

So it would be nice to resolve 2.5.0 situation by changing just the caller
side, but

> so the correct fix might be to the caller side.

except that there's no way to fix this in caller's side only. There's no other
way to get access to advance structure of A_FUTURE either. At minimum we need
to add separate function like advance_by_number_future_included().


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/bugs/?23231>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to