BTW, In the Spirit of .. the joy of testing by experience, I think rather than make arguments or logical intellectual decisions I'm going to play with the patch reversed and if I can with the new patch.
Will let you know the results of how satisfying it is. Reminds me of my youth at Microsoft test labs :) Seems less silly to me than just debating logics and facts. On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Charles Posinoff <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks my friend. > > This is a little bit more up to fresh times. > > I'm wondering about one or two things: > > The svg design does look like the Pre 1808 design. What about a more > modern design for the new one? Do you need any help with that? > > Also, apologies if I added to confusion in my earlier comment, but what is > the reasoning behind civil war city names? > > Thank God. > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Daniel Markstedt < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Follow-up Comment #9, patch #2155 (project freeciv): >> >> Hello Pope Adrianus. Thanks for your feedback. >> Instead of simply reversing the patch, let me look into adding a separate >> 'modern' Vatican City nation to the game. >> You can follow the progress at new patch ticket >> https://gna.org/patch/?6372 >> >> Best, >> Daniel >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Reply to this item at: >> >> <http://gna.org/patch/?2155> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Message sent via/by Gna! >> http://gna.org/ >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
