Follow-up Comment #11, patch #6434 (project freeciv):
> Would inclusion in 2.6 require conversion to the 2.6 format?
While our current practice is to keep format of included scenarios updated to
match the freeciv version, we could make exception in this case. The reason we
want to have the formats usually updated is to make it easy to adopt features
of the new version to the scenario and not letting it to fall behind in
development, but the results would be the opposite in this case, there's no
point in doing it.
It seems to be in S2_4 format at the moment. Would it make sense to update it
one step forward to S2_5 format as there's already stable releases of that
branch?
S2_5 is the first version where the update is relatively easy with the help of
the /scensave command (in S2_5 available only in debug builds, but it's enough
that one person runs the command for the scenario) - or should be. This is
actually good first test to see what /scensave does to such complex scenario.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?6434>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
