URL:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?24746>
Summary: Transferring city between players forcibly re-homes
homeless units
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sat 11 Jun 2016 02:09:33 PM BST
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: In Progress
Assigned to: jtn
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: 2.5.4
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: Any
Planned Release: 2.5.5, 2.6.0, 3.0.0
Contains string changes: No
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Spotted during bug #24724:
> I also notice that the surplus Leader also has Emerald City as a
> home city, whereas Leaders are normally homeless. I think that
> homeless units become homed if transferred with a city (maybe
> even ignoring the NoHome flag?). That's probably another bug.
Certainly NoHome units should not get a new home city.
Whether units that are initially homeless but rehomeable should be rehomed is
more arguable. In some games, homeless units are a unique advantage, but not
always; ideally this would be under ruleset author control. For now, just
don't re-home them.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?24746>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
