On Tue, 5 May 2015 09:49:22 -0500 Caleb Williams <cale...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have mixed feelings about putting everything up on the repository,
I am surprised. I think we need to store it *somewhere*, if only to avoid losing it completely next time the web site is cracked. > The only thing I don't like is having to deal with SF's Git implementation. Fair enough. I am not troubled by it as I only use git at the command line. Is that your only reservation? > I don't have any real issue with the website being included with the > release (not that too many are offline these days, but you could view > everything offline if needed). We will need to weed out PHP file then > though as the end user's computer will not be able to process them unless > they already have a PHP install running to parse the pages (something we > definitely don't want to depend on). The initial step is to cull the site down to the core static pages. PHP is not required there. > Conversely, if we want eventual dynamic content delivered via PHP Let us decide that when the time comes. The opinion of the people who do the work will carry the most weight. Cheers, Mike Pope
pgpob8EjIL_O9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
