That is another good option, thing is the community will need someone versed in website coding and styling if that person leaves there is a bit of an issue there.
Jonathan Aquilina On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:36 AM David Lewis <highwayofl...@gmail.com> wrote: > We do have the option of using GitHub pages, which works well for Jekyll, > and free for OSS. They website would be driven directly from Git and > wouldn't need to worry about FTP access. > > David > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, 8:27 PM Michael T. Pope <mp...@computer.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:15:09 +0100 >> Jonathan Aquilina <eagles051...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > This is really up to those in charge to take the decision but the >> hosting >> > offer still stands. SF can be a huge pain in the rump though. >> >> I too appreciate the offer, but I am reluctant to split the project over >> yet more sites. SF has its disadvantages, but we have no replacement for >> the SF forums. Meanwhile I am hopeful the new static generator will >> reduce >> the maintenance pain in the long term. >> >> Apologies for the slow reply, sorting out the bug list and mail backlog is >> taking me a while. >> >> Cheers, >> Mike Pope >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freecol-developers mailing list >> Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers >> >
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
