> On 03/06/2011 07:33 PM, Michael Blizek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Hello. > > > On 18:22 Sun 06 Mar , Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > > > >> * Mesh networking - I've suggested packaging netsukuku, but as > >> pro-embedding crew pointed out, a much more lightweight equivalent > >> is desirable, if indeed such an alternative exists. > >> > > Do we sack this? There is some IP based stuff available and I am > programming > > a prococol on layer 3+4 with qos/credits, onion routing and some > other things. > > > > Probably, I just remembered that we have at least one viable > alternative: the B.A.T.M.A.N. project (http://www.open-mesh.org/) > suggested by James Valleroy some half a year ago. It's written in C > and > packaged for Debian(!). It doesn't address the question of onion > routing > tho. > > Anyway, good luck with cor, but I'm afraid we can't make a definite > decision before your thing is stable. > --Luka Mar?eti? >
There is another user-space mesh routing program called babeld which is also in Debian: http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/babel/ It supports both IPv4 and IPv6, and they mention it should work well on embedded systems. James Valleroy _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
