TL;DR: I agree that a service provider might cut off a FreedomBox user, claiming a terms of service violation. I don't think it would lead to legal trouble necessarily, but it might be very bad press for the service provider.

On 3/19/11 4:59 PM, Thomas Lord wrote:
 I think we have an annoying problem, perhaps someone can correct me
 if I'm wrong:

I agree this could be a problem, though specifically one of service interruption.

 There has been talk in various contexts about having FreedomBox (FB)
 interact with things like Twitter (Twit) and FaceBook (FacB). ...

 I think this might be legally unachievable.

If a service provider decides that a FreedomBox owner is doing something with their APIs that violates the terms of service, they're well within their rights to cut off service.

This is where I fail at being a lawyer, but I think that's as far as it goes. I suppose if a company's legal counsel really wanted to be a jerk and make a point, they could try drumming up some form of "hacking" charges against someone.

 The process of requesting and being granted an application key comes
 with legal encumbrances. There are two general kinds of encumbrance
 that matter:

I don't think these are legal encumbrances, as such. It might more easily turn into something with legal consequences if someone then continues to try using the service after being banned. (ie. accused of hacking, *then* comes legal trouble)

 We need a legal expert to look into the matter further but it appears
 to me to be effectively impossible to write free software programs
 which interoperate as desired with the Twit API.

Yeah, need legal expertise to review. I'm just making guesses here, honestly.

 (2) The mere fact that critical APIs are protected by such
 keys means that services like FacB and Twit have absolute authority
 over what client applications may and may not do.

Absolutely true. And, one of the reasons why we're here.

Of course, if a FreedomBox was cut off from accessing a service like Twitter or Facebook, it could be turned into a nice headline supporting the FreedomBox cause. (Assuming I'm right about the legal stuff, because it would really suck if someone went to jail for using Twitter, good headline or not.)

--
[email protected]
http://decafbad.com
{web,mad,computer} scientist

_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Reply via email to