On 11-05-04 at 08:44am, Joshua Spodek wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:26 +0000, > [email protected] wrote: > > I believe we should not try to cover all cyber warfare use with the > > FreedomBox, but (at least at first) on creating a box that is > > _usable_ and with relatively "harmless" tools loaded on it. > > Moreover, if someone wants a FreedomBox that works in a "cyber war > zone", he or she will be able to make a better one starting from a > working generic FreedomBox in a non-cyber war zone than trying to get > one started from scratch now. > > Personally, I imagine the best thing we can do for people who could > use a FreedomBox in a dangerous place today is to make a working one > in a non-dangerous place as soon as possible. > > Since the software will all be free, anyone will be able to modify it > as necessary or desired. They'll know how to modify it or request help > from others better than anyone.
Thanks. That is _exactly_ what I tried to say. You are good! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
