Hi Tony, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tony Godshall > Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2011 2:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Relationship driven privacy > > ... > > Another concern for me is the project has a BSD license. Does this > > make it incompatible with the freedombox project? Which > licences does > > the freedombox support? > ... > > The BSD license without the advertising clause meets all > relevant FLOSS definitions: > > https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Debian_Free_Sof > tware_Guidelines > http://www.opensource.org/osd.html > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ModifiedBSD
Thanks for the links. It's a pity the "modified BSD" license doesn't have it's own unique name to avoid all the confusion because I cannot tell which BSD license it uses. It was interesting learning about the social contract. I don't think Friendika's will be accepted by Freedom because it hooks into social networks i.e. leaking people's privacy. There is a new fork (Friendika-Z) within the project to not hook into social networks. That might be of interest to FreedomBox and it's license when the fork is released. _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
