> There should definitely be a separate WG for user interface > discussions, which so far now, has not received much attention on the > list. +1
>network >protocols and privacy/identity distribution WG should be created. +1 - I think: the easiest would create(Etherpad, yeah) - add to some wiki list All the propositions from here - already, from TAC, reuse from other projects FBox alike, related initatives.. in form of one Big list, after that - vote up for each feature to start with, after that - combine, merge, mix individual features in groups, looking at the places where groups interests are crossed and - separate this in another kind of groups, so, all the structure could be Easy understandable for new-comers, contributors, investors. i hope - looking at the possible *size* of FBox - tag/categories system would find its place - helping the structurization needs, or, maybe, it won't be needed - but - if these cross-interest "groups" would be *formed* in other, still - obvious for observers - way. Making the very large by mean of focus - groups - that wouldn't need these trans-operability "groups" to act in such a strong-coupled manner, could be hard to maintain, however - Debian has the experience, i think. PS: my vote is for GitHub -- github.com/mozilla shows that it's very productive - to have a possibility of broad outer fork and help, it helps to widespread and given that GithHub is the largest rep collector, including these project that may be used in FBox, it helps the actual coding process. However i don't know if GitHub itself wouldn't be considered a proprietary cloud that we need to move off :) Anyway - git system is what i recommend. _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
