:: Sandy Harris Dienstag 07 Februar 2012 > What about Tahoe? > https://tahoe-lafs.org
A conceptual difference is that Tahoe is targeting homogeneous storage networks, where access to the servers is assumed because they also need to run Tahoe software, whereas NubiSave goes to great lengths (e.g. by contributing new FUSE modules to fuse.sf.net) to be able to talk to existing online storage providers despite their (often found) inability or unwillingness to be talked to in a uniform way. A second conceptual difference is that Tahoe is more of a (static) RAIC and NubiSave more of a (dynamic) RAOC, where means that security can be traded for cost or proximity can be traded for signup privacy. This mechanism relies on formal provider descriptions. A practical difference is that Tahoe looks like a genuine engineering project, so it is available for more platforms, has better testing, and certainly an existing user base. Josef _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
