I think this feature is critical for a Tahoe LAFS cloud back end (size of individual clouds still probably limited to <100 nodes) as otherwise the introducer would still be a single point of failure. Ideally, each node in the cloud should also run its own introducer.
----- Forwarded message from David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> ----- From: David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 15:43:49 +0100 To: Tahoe-LAFS development <[email protected]> CC: Eugen Leitl <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [tahoe-dev] Potential use for personal backup User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 On 28/05/12 13:39, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:32:56AM +0400, Vladimir Arseniev wrote: >> On 05/23/2012 12:16 AM, Saint Germain wrote: >> >>> The only problem I see, is that I will be limited by the storage >>> capacity. The remote server I intend to rent has 2 TB and I was >>> already thinking that it was too small for my "group" (5-10 people). >> >> You could create a private grid for your group. If there were ten nodes >> in your grid, you could use the default 3-of-10 settings. > > Is there any expectations when the multiple introducer code will make > it into the official stable? Around version 1.11, I think. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
