On 12-06-07 at 05:52pm, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:29:02AM -0500, Nick Daly wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > > > Still, it could be fun to try it. FreedomBox could possibly come > > > with both styles -- some fraction of hard drive space could be > > > allocated for the experimental global grid, plus a different slice > > > of the hard drive could be configurable for the use of your > > > specific friends. > > > > What's Tahoe's required overhead? Is it static (5KB, regardless of > > partition size), or does it grow with the reserved space (2% from 0 > > - 5 GB, 3% for > 5GB)? My biggest concern with this is space, as > > the 2GB microSD card the DreamPlug comes with is tough to manage. > > If we can use the SD card slot when it's available, this'll be less > > of a problem, but I haven't really thought about that problem yet. > > By the time you ship the DreamPlug hardware will look ancient. There > will be enough CPU, RAM and flash space for Tahoe LAFS.
Apply that attitude to all components (assuming we agree that FreedomBox should contain more parts than Tahoe-LAFS), and the question becomes real again! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
