On 1 Nov 2012, at 14:45, Melvin Carvalho <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just touching base on this. We just spent 3 very productive days at TPAC > with, among others, timbl and alex bertalis, who reliably informs us that he > coined the term "WebBox". > > I was wondering your thoughts about working with the guidelines of the > upcoming REC track, Linked Data Platform [1], which is being developed by > Alex and others. > > I think in the case of freedombox it would be desireable to have not only a > web identity but to tie it to GPG, which is something I've already done some > work on. > > Would love to know your thoughts. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter.html I had a look at your link, but I have hardly any W3C experience, so I'm struggling to understand what you'd like my thoughts on. In terms of working within its scope, it's difficult to say. I'm leaning heavily towards working with a single form of JSON-LD (specifically the "expanded" form), and putting all of my effort towards that, rather than turtle or xml/rdf etc. Similarly, we're finding sticking to REST is really constraining. The charter does mention JSON-LD, so hopefully they'll make something that developers who like JSON will understand and want to use. Best, Dan
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
