On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 11:35 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Nick M. Daly (2012-11-29 06:16:25) > > Jack Wilborn writes: > > > > > IMHO, I say that if they want to keep copyright to their code, then > > > we probably don't want it in the FB. My understanding is that we > > > wanted a copyright free box, has this changed or have I > > > misunderstood? > > > > I think you missed something big there. As far as I know [0], that's > > not a goal at all. Nobody's even asked me for a contributor > > agreement, much less copyright assignment: we'll cross that bridge > > when we come to it, I suppose. > > If "we" are Debian, then we need someone physical and identifiable in > charge of each piece of code, but those can act as proxy for others > keeping anonymous or pseudonymous. Important for Debian is that all code > is freely _licensed_. > > If "we" are the FreedomBox Foundation, then it will very much surprise > me if they[0] have different agenda than use Debian for all software > parts of the project.
Hi Jonas are you saying people that prefer to use other distributions would not be welcome to contribute (and port?) FBX to a different distribution ? Simo. [0] I am not Debian -- Simo Sorce Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <[email protected]> Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
