On 10/27/2013 3:24 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On 10/27/2013 01:26 PM, Bill Cox wrote:
I would love feedback on an idea for promoting more internet freedom.

Here's the problem: Tor has little public support, because most Tor
traffic is wasted on supporting bad behavior.  When I ran a Tor node, it
became clear that most of my bandwidth was being wasted on video
downloads.  People want to promote free speech, not child pornography.

The real solution is to improve hidden services so they can be an alternative to insecure internet services. Exit nodes are like off-ramps, and nobody likes having one next to their house. But relay-only nodes are like by-passes, and encryption essentially lets relay operators build them without ever letting any
of the creeps cruise around in their neighborhood.

It drives me crazy that we take simple activities that should naturally be secure P2P based, and route them through insecure servers. A FreedomBox is an excellent solution for things like end-to-end encrypted email that is unlikely to get hacked by the NSA. My thinking is that a Tor-like P2P social network might encourage more participation, and there's no reason Tor's awesome ability to offer hidden services could not work. We'd just do a better job at keeping the creeps out while offering those hidden services.

might still be "bad data", but at least for me that's a much weaker argument.
For example, I don't know anyone who refuses to use the tools granted to
them in the justice system because they are so often used to defend
drug dealers, murders, and thieves.  I also don't know anyone who
doesn't believe in maintaining city, state, and interstate infrastructure, _even_
when just the act of driving carries a rather large risk of death when
compared to other forms of transportation.

-Jonathan

Certainly Tor is used often used for good purposes, specifically promoting various freedoms. A little free speech probably outweighs a lot of illegal file sharing. However, my experience with Tor to date is:

- My Tor node was being used mostly to watch videos.
- A online chat meeting of mostly blind users was attacked by a Tor griefer who kept posting known crash words that would cause most blind listeners' text-to-speech engines to crash.
- A web site of mine was hacked from a Tor node.

Unfortunately, the world has lots of people who enjoy making life miserable for everyone else. Can we support good anonymous behavior, while discouraging guys like the griefer who trashed the online meeting of blind people? One idea is to hold people accountable for their actions by having those actions impact their online reputation of their secret identities. This idea needs work. It might be an enhancement to Tor, or maybe a new system.

Thanks for the feedback,
Bill

_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Reply via email to