---------- Vidarebefordrat meddelande ---------- Från: "Petter Reinholdtsen" <[email protected]>
> [Nick Daly] > > Hi folks, I'm trying to fix the /etc/network/interface > > misconfiguration in the Freedom-Maker generated images, but I'm not > > sure where best to apply the fix. The underlying issue is that the > > interface file doesn't include these lines: > > > > allow-hotplug eth0 > > iface eth0 inet dhcp > > Why 'allow-hotplug' and not 'auto'? 'allow-hotplug' is obsolete, as > far as I know, and require network-manager to be running. I did not > plan to use network-manager, but only ifupdown. Should we use > network-manager? The directive allow-hotplug has nothing to do with Network-Manager. The NM only handles network devices NOT mentioned in /e/n/interfaces. If allow-hotplug is obsoleted or not I don't know. But it is handles by ifupdown. And if there is a network connected to the device or not. And no, NM isn't needed and should not be used on a server. > > If you have recommendations on how to patch the Freedom-Maker [0] or > > FreedomBox-Setup [1] packages to handle this case, I'd appreciate > > your help. > > The network setup is done at first boot in > freedombox-setup/first-run.d/05_network, and there I was told by > jsullevan to use eth1, not eth0, on the dreamplug. What is correct? What to use of eth0 or eth1 depends on the hardware and what name udev gives the device. > Happy hacking > Petter Reinholdtsen /A Jackson
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
