On 28 December 2014 at 22:45, Markus Sabadello <[email protected]> wrote:
> On today's call we talked about whether Plinth or jwchat should be the > start page. > And we currently have Owncloud at the path /owncloud. > > I think this question of "URI namespace layout" will become more > important as we add more applications to the box. > > One pattern I have been experimenting with is creating subdomains for > each new application which has a web interface. > I think this is more reliable than using folders, since some > applications may assume they are installed at the root /. > Which applications assume root install out of curiosity? > > So if my PageKite name is markus.pagekite.me, I could have: > - owncloud.markus.pagekite.me > - plinth.markus.pagekite.me > - jwchat.markus.pagekite.me > - radicale.markus.pagekite.me > - diaspora.markus.pagekite.me > - mailpile.markus.pagekite.me > - etc. > > These should also work with an "internal" (dnsmasq-provided) domain when > I access the box from within my home network, e.g.: > - owncloud.freedombox > - plinth.freedombox > - jwchat.freedombox > - radicale.freedombox > - diaspora.freedombox > - mailpile.freedombox > - etc. > > In Plinth, I may want to have an option to set a "default" one, i.e. > which one should show up at markus.pagekite.me > > When using subdomains rather than folders, we also need different Tor > .onion addresses for each application, which is probably preferable anyway. > > Thoughts? > > Markus > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
