On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:48:43 -0500, David Turner <novalis _AT_ fsf.org> wrote:

I heard that you were considering a proprietary executable compression
scheme for FreeDOS.  I'm just writing to let you know the licensing and
freedom implications of this.

The compressor rewrites an executable (in the FreeDOS case, one under
the GPL), inserting decompression code.  This creates a derivative work
of the GPL software, so the decompression code at least would need to be
under the GPL.

The copyright holders of FreeDOS could write an exception to allow
non-GPL decompressor code.  In order to do this, all copyright holders
would have to agree. This would solve the licensing problem, but the
output of the decompressor would not be Free Software.  So, I hope you
won't choose to use a non-free executable compressor.

Thank you for your posting here! Joergen forwarded me your answer to his questions. Please be assured that nobody here would agree to break the spirit or the letter of the GPL, and a solution will be found for this problem, which will at least include what you suggested, so no exceptions to the GPL would be necessary! But the discussion with Joergen has not ended yet. Let's be more patient. Meanwhile, we'll keep using UPX, which is released under the GPL, with the exception of its proprietary compression library called NRV = "Not Really Vanished" by Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer.


Regards,
Lucho


------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to