Arkady V.Belousov wrote: >MD> Simply because many Open Source/FreeSoftware advocates believe that >MD> developers should act a certain way towards source code does not mean that >MD> it is what everyone else believes or should believe. > > You _may_ not believe. There is Microsoft, which doesn't believes. Time >shows who is right.
Oh good grief, now I, as a person agitating for more open public domain software both within FreeDOS and outside of it, am being joined with Microsoft in its role of the archetypical promoter of closed software. A foul viper is in your midst, FreeDOS is in peril! What's next? Everybody who doesn't agree with the more extreme Open Source/Free Software positions is a felonious bunny-stomping cauliflower-eating toilet-bowl-drinking deviate-in-training? Less colorfully stated, public domain software is further away from the Microsoft practices you dislike than the open source software practices you do like. FreeDOS could well stand to have more of it. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
