Hi,
This "written offer" requirement is really scaring indeed. Does the GPL say that it must be signed and stamped by a notary? Or passed through the United Nations Security Council? ;-)
Just joking, of course - please don't take the above sentences seriously!
:-)
BTW, email "written offer" is fine.
But including the source with the binaries would be preferable.
Of course, and even better - the binaries with the source! ;-)
Perhaps BAHCL would accept the binaries, and post them on his site?
Indeed, I can't understand why he doesn't want to include binaries?
Well, I've sometimes done that in the past, too, so I can't be too critical of BAHCL. Binaries aren't strictly required by the GNU GPL, and if web space is a problem, I can understand not including them.
-jh
-- _____________________________________________________________________________ This email message has been automatically encrypted using ROT-26.
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
