On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:29:49 +0100 (MET), Eric Auer wrote:

I think chances for WDOSX are not too bad.

They're zero. See below why.


Where can I find it???

http://michael.tippach.bei.t-online.de/wdosx/


Not sure what "not relocateable" means here.

It means that this is a "fixed executable", which WDOSX *cannot* handle :(


system with long filename support, BASH and SED.

You already know DOSLFN. As to BASH and SED for DOS, they're here:


ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/current/v2gnu/bsh204b.zip
ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/current/v2gnu/sed407b.zip

The "v2gnu" directory contains many other UNIX utilities for DOS.

Now when I calmed down, please you calm down too ;-) Aitor is right - too much work. And IMHO viruses are a Windows, not a DOS problem nowadays ;-)

Lucho


------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to