Hi,

Alain escribió:

Hi Aitor,

PS: Sorry if I was a little bit though, I am still a bit shocked. New list promised this week (except maybe polishing the post-1.0 list, but will do my best too)


I could be somewhat at fault here. I started a thead about version 1.0 unreguarding your comming list.

Not at all...


the fact is that IMHO that list is too big, and not too well priorised.

Well, I didn't intend to add a complex system of priorities other than pre-/post- 1.0...


As an example there are many commands there that don't even exist in MS-DOS, like undelete.

I am always open to discussions about what should be in or out the list, of course. I just transcript what all of you say here (preferably after the update). When we posted it for the first time I asked wether there were comments about it, maybe you missed the discussion? ;-))


When I started that thread, I was hoping that I could bring someone to help dosfsck which in my opinion is the most needed feature that is not advancing...

Ok, no prob!!
I'd just need one day more, today it was a bit hard for those of us that live in Madrid.


Cheers everyone.
Aitor



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to