Hi, criminal news... I share the point of view that I can compile things with museum Turbo C and even spread them. But I cannot spread Turbo C itself easily: I am supposed to send people to the Borland museum to fetch their own copy if they want one. If you disagree about that, I can publish source only versions and somebody else can compile binaries from them and send them back to me... well, maybe I already do it like that? The binaries are completely identical :-). This reminds me of the many times that Tom asked me to test EMM386 patches before I send them, although I do not have TASM. Should I see this as an invitation to use a pirated version? Who cares. I have too many things to maintain anyway, so I am not planning to send any EMM386 patches again anytime soon. The things which I do maintain all compile in TC, NASM and DJGPP, and at least the latter 2 are even open source themselves. As explained, I have no problems with the Turbo C museum license either. Duh.
Eric. PS: NANSI compiles with Arrowsoft ASM, freeware non-supported closed source version. Should be okay license-wise, too. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
