Hi,
Michael Devore escribió:
To avoid inflaming the issue, I'm not going to ask why all new documentation is desperately needed to be written for something which has behaved effectively the same way for end-users for the past six months. And roughly 20 years for MS-DOS, as far as general behavior. If it's really all that horribly important, someone send me a target spec and I'll invest time crafting a document that shall cause the hard-hearted to cry tears of joy such beautiful literature has flowered and brought documentary peace to the FreeDOS universe of scribblings. Or, at least it will contain examples, both marginally readable and modestly accurate, of nouns and verbs conjoined in syntactic grouping.
I don't know if I am understanding what you refer to, but in my opinion nobody is saying that new documentation is desperatedly needed to, say, describe thoroughly the behaviour of such tools.
Before Rob took over HTML-Help, the help files there were (as Tom correctly complained repeatedly) info taken from MS-Help, thus useless for FreeDOS users. And I don't think it's too much of a quarrel to write a couple of HTML-files describing, for example, that there is no /INT15= option in HIMEM, and that we have instead /TEST, for example. An easy place where to find what the commandline is.
Aitor
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
