Hi!

26-Сен-2004 12:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

>>instuction validness (for example, what about F0 0F C7 C8?) and how will
>>behave system in case, when instruction will work incorrectly? As I
>>understand, you mean instruction executing in ring 0, and here EMM386 can't
>>trap wrong execution?
MD> I'm only going to support common ranges for the 1-, 2- and 3- byte 0fh
MD> opcodes that are related to what's already available.  Otherwise you can
MD> get goofy crashes when there's a bug or bad jump to garbage, or you never
MD> see a correctly reported bad opcode message.

     This is bad. :( Please, add as much, as possible, more checks before
executing emulated instruction inside RING0, else we may/will receive
reports about "bad FreeDOS/EMM386 behavior", whereas programs itself should
be blamed.

MD> If it's outside the supported
MD> range it will kick out illegal feedback as before.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to