Hi!
17-Мар-2005 12:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov"
<[email protected]>:
te>>> if it crashes, it uses 386 instructions.
>> Isn't sy2pac open/free source?
te> NO.
Then why you yourself can't look at your program (if you not remember
its content) and say us which requirements (CPU) are for it?
>> indicated by .386 directive); if no, then sy2pac usage may violate rules,
>> when this program used together with GPLed software.
te> that's why HIMEM/EMM386 aren't GPL any longer.
te> RTFL !! (read the fucking license)
I was not mean HIMEM/EMM386 specifically, I mean any GPLed software.
And I don't know sy2pac license. But if it closed source, then, as some
suggest, usage of your sy2pac is prohibited for GPLed developers.
PS: I don't agree with your opinion about GPL peculiarities, I think that
GPL serves _its purpose_ (almost) well, but its your deal and I will not
restart flame about GPL.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
