At 06:28 PM 4/30/2005 -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
Michael Devore wrote:We had this discussion. I say that until there's a FreeDOS database, SourceForge archives work about as well as an ever-growing mongo huge READ.ME file. I also say that I've allocated -- overallocated -- as much free time to working on this as I can afford from my real life and any more nonprogramming overhead (and I do too much already for my taste) is a nonstarter.
Do you mean something like this:
http://www.codeweavers.com/site/compatibility/browse/cat?cat_id=113
They list a bunch of software, then give it a rating "Gold, Silver, Bronze, Honorable Mention, Known not to work" or list it as untested. And there's a link to more details for each program.
Close enough. Overkill on things like screenshot tabs and video-game style rankings, votes and pledges. Would be better if people could search on the details and known issues tabs, etc., but certainly fits requirements way beyond anything currently available. Beats the hell out of the idea of a constantly appended READ.ME growing to megabytes with semi-random scrawling, that's for sure.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
