On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:07:53 -0500, you wrote: Hi Michael,
>If he's saying that we need to implement a more substantial lock/unlock, >there is no case for doing so. The lock function returns all information >related to physical memory contiguity. We explicitly flag and otherwise >indicate that internal remap and DMA buffers are not supported, as is >explicitly allowed by the VDS specification. Further, since UMB logical >addresses will never change after their initial setup, physically locking >those blocks is unnecessary. > >Bottom line is that without direction information to the contrary, I do not >see any of the given information as impacting EMM386 as currently implemented. Will this affect some old DOS programs that work under MS-EMM but failed under FD-EMM? Sorry I didn't understand the whole thing, but I care for those DOS program works fine before, but now under FreeDOS not working anymore. This hurts the compatibility. Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
