At 11:00 PM 8/18/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:

>MD> make it work, but this is a compatibility issue that ought to be 
>addressed
>MD> in some fashion.  Even if it's a "QB4 is too stupid to live" announcement.
>  1. I think, this change may be delayed (for post-1.0).

Normally, I would be in 100% sympathy and agreement with that idea.  1.0 
shouldn't wait on a single application (unless it's one of the top ten DOS 
applications) .  But this isn't a single application.  This is in a 
language compiler, and thus the problem is potentially is in an entire 
_class_ of applications.  Plus, it's a popular compiler.  There could be a 
serious amount of failures out there due to this.

But that's just my speculation.  Maybe there is only one problem 
application.  However, unless someone knows more, we need to make best 
guesses based on available evidence, and my guess is that not adjusting for 
a popular compiler might be trouble.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to