Hi!
2-Ноя-2006 15:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
[email protected]:
JH> Using 2-digit subversions ("1.01") looks too similar to "1.0.1" kind of
JH> naming.
Yes. And for me, second looks more sensible, because allows explicitly
differ intermediate releases (1.0 == 1.0.0) from bugfix releases (1.0.1).
JH> I'd rather we reserve those numbers for bug-fix releases that
JH> don't add any new functionality.
JH> For standard distributions, I prefer we use the simpler 1-digit
JH> subversions.
See above: we may omit trailing zeros (.0).
JH> In my mind, if we make 9 small updates after "1.0", the
JH> 10th update really should get labelled "2.0".
Agreed. FreeDOS evolves not too fast, and big time is enough
_additional_ reason to increase higher version number.
JH> Maybe the functionality
JH> in that "2.0" isn't very major from the previous releases, but it's
JH> still an increase in functionality over "1.0".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
